Tuesday, May 29, 2012

BOOK: Swann by Carol Shields

Swann by Carol Shields, 397 pages

Canadian Book Challenge 5

This novel is sometimes called Swann: A Literary Mystery, but as a reader of mystery books, I would say that title is a bit of a stretch for this book. There is a slight mystery, but the main one, Who was Mary Swann? is more of philosophical question. The end result is there really wasn't much to learn about Mary Swann and I would rank this near the bottom of Shields' books so far in my reading adventure.

Four main characters - a feminist literary critic, the poet's biographer, a small-town librarian, and a crusty, brilliant newspaper editor each get a section, giving the reader their own background, as well as fleshing out the character of Mary Swann. Well, it tries to, but there is precious little information about the uneducated farm woman whose poetry is 'discovered' after her brutal murder. I felt that Shields was commenting on the world of literary scholarship, as so many people were commenting and making conclusions about Swann that went far beyond what Swann herself would have meant or understood. It was often my view of poetry while I was in school - who am I (or my teacher) to say what the theme or symbols meant? Because the four characters have their own motives for what they say about Swann, what is concluded has to be taken with a grain of salt, especially as we get to see them all change or omit facts that further their opinions. Which now makes everything I read suspect! Who recorded this information, and why?

The final section, where all the main characters meet at the Swann Symposium, is written as a screenplay, after stating that all the characters were fictional. This threw me a little bit - how can the characters in the novel be described as fictional? What then is the next part? Anyway, the slight mystery of who is taking the Swann artifacts is explored in this section, and the characters get to interact. Throughout it all, Shields characteristic writing of details and characters development is here. I just kept hoping there would be a little more plot to the story. If I was more of a literaty scholar or historian, I would have enjoyed it more.

Comments (13)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Oi! Sounds a bit hoity-toity for me! The words "brutal murder" caught my eye but the rest doesn't sound my cup of tea. I loved "The Stone Diaries" so much.
1 reply · active 669 weeks ago
It's a quiet comptemplative book, and actually, like the Stone Diaries, builds the life of a person from many different perspectives. I wasn't a huge fan of Stone Diaries, so you might like this one better than me.
What a shame! I love the idea of this book -- the structure sounds interesting, and multiple narrators are one of my favorite things. But without a good story to hang it on, these extra-stylistic books can seem all style, no substance.
1 reply · active 669 weeks ago
But it's Shields, so the writing is good, and she builds her story. I was a bit thrown by the movie screenplay, so you may enjoy that structure change.
Even though it didn't work for you, it sounds like something I would love. I've been meaning to read more Shields after enjoying Larry's Party so much last year. I'll have to add this one to the list!
1 reply · active 669 weeks ago
I imagine you would like it! Somebody (?) said it was their favorite Shields book. I still have Larry's Party to read, and many people seem to really enjoy it.
hm, I find I don't really remember this Shields at all. At least with some of the others I can still remember the plot.
1 reply · active 669 weeks ago
This one doesn't seem very popular/known in her backlist. I would think you'd remember this if you read it, so many you still have a Shields to read!
This is one of my favourite Shields' novels, and I"m not a scholar, but I do love history, and particularly the idea that ordinary lives can be extraordinary and not only mysterious, but, at least as far as the historical record goes, largely lost.

Still, I can see where the subtitle might have thrown you off (especially because you do enjoy mysteries anyway!); I do think it's more of a quiet novel than a mystery novel, and more bookish than mysterious. The idea of assembling a woman's life is quintessentially CS, I think.

Do you think that you might have enjoyed it more if the subtitle hadn't led you astray? Well, I suppose that's an impossible question to answer, really.
2 replies · active 669 weeks ago
I think I was mostly annoyed at the implications the scholars made up to go with their view of Swann. I was hoping there would be more mystery, and it may have led me to be somewhat disappointed. It was still very Shields, and powerful, and like you say - quintessential Shields. It is probably more like The Stone Diaries, which I wasn't the hugest fan of.

I didn't dislike it, it was just so much quieter than I expected. The way that biographies are built up based on sometimes nothing! or made up, paints a cynical view on what we 'know' about famous authors. And Shields has written biographies! Austen I believe, and Susannah Moody.
In my mind, it's like The Stone Diaries but also Unless, which also has so many ideas about how we tell stories and of what they are made. I loved her work on Jane Austen and if I remember correctly, she takes on that matter directly (particularly given the little available on Austen); even if you don't normally enjoy biographies or if Austen's not a favourite, I think you might like this one. (Anyway, it's very short!)
I'm hoping to read more books by Shields, not sure if this well be one I read next - I think I'd have the same issues as I had with the Box Garden. Good review.
Seems like a great read, like the rest of Shields books

Post a new comment

Comments by