
Canadian Book Challenge 5
This novel is sometimes called Swann: A Literary Mystery, but as a reader of mystery books, I would say that title is a bit of a stretch for this book. There is a slight mystery, but the main one, Who was Mary Swann? is more of philosophical question. The end result is there really wasn't much to learn about Mary Swann and I would rank this near the bottom of Shields' books so far in my reading adventure.
Four main characters - a feminist literary critic, the poet's biographer, a small-town librarian, and a crusty, brilliant newspaper editor each get a section, giving the reader their own background, as well as fleshing out the character of Mary Swann. Well, it tries to, but there is precious little information about the uneducated farm woman whose poetry is 'discovered' after her brutal murder. I felt that Shields was commenting on the world of literary scholarship, as so many people were commenting and making conclusions about Swann that went far beyond what Swann herself would have meant or understood. It was often my view of poetry while I was in school - who am I (or my teacher) to say what the theme or symbols meant? Because the four characters have their own motives for what they say about Swann, what is concluded has to be taken with a grain of salt, especially as we get to see them all change or omit facts that further their opinions. Which now makes everything I read suspect! Who recorded this information, and why?
The final section, where all the main characters meet at the Swann Symposium, is written as a screenplay, after stating that all the characters were fictional. This threw me a little bit - how can the characters in the novel be described as fictional? What then is the next part? Anyway, the slight mystery of who is taking the Swann artifacts is explored in this section, and the characters get to interact. Throughout it all, Shields characteristic writing of details and characters development is here. I just kept hoping there would be a little more plot to the story. If I was more of a literaty scholar or historian, I would have enjoyed it more.
NicolaMa 29p · 670 weeks ago
raidergirl3 91p · 669 weeks ago
jennysbooks 89p · 669 weeks ago
raidergirl3 91p · 669 weeks ago
nomadreader 48p · 669 weeks ago
raidergirl3 91p · 669 weeks ago
Kailana · 669 weeks ago
raidergirl3 91p · 669 weeks ago
buriedinprint 64p · 669 weeks ago
Still, I can see where the subtitle might have thrown you off (especially because you do enjoy mysteries anyway!); I do think it's more of a quiet novel than a mystery novel, and more bookish than mysterious. The idea of assembling a woman's life is quintessentially CS, I think.
Do you think that you might have enjoyed it more if the subtitle hadn't led you astray? Well, I suppose that's an impossible question to answer, really.
raidergirl3 91p · 669 weeks ago
I didn't dislike it, it was just so much quieter than I expected. The way that biographies are built up based on sometimes nothing! or made up, paints a cynical view on what we 'know' about famous authors. And Shields has written biographies! Austen I believe, and Susannah Moody.
Buried In Print · 669 weeks ago
Jules · 669 weeks ago
aliceb · 562 weeks ago