Fugitive Pieces by Anne Michaels, 294 pages
Orange Prize Winner; 1% well read
Very poetic, beautiful language, I enjoyed reading it even if I didn't necessarily know what was going on. It's not really a good sign if you have to check wikipedia or sparknotes after finishing a book to find out what exactly happened. I guess the main idea is about survivors and the guilt they live with. I liked the first section in the story of Jakob but was completely bewildered in the second section. Who was the narrator now?
The orphaned Jakob is taken in by Athos, a paleonbiologist, providing metaphors about unearthing things and looking below layers, and the fact that there can be a whole world buried beneath us that we can't see. They arrive in Canada from Greece each with a past they are trying to deal with.
I couldn't turn my anguish from the precise moment of death. I was focused on that historical split second: the tableau of the haunting trinity - perpetrator, victim, witness.
But at what moment does wood become stone, peat become coal, limestone become marble? The gradual instant.
I wasn't expecting a book about world war two, and I didn't realize that the Germans were in Greece too. Their reach was far and the after effects many, sometimes lasting generations.
But each time a memory or story slinks away, it takes more of me with it.
I'm not a fan of books told in metaphors, but this book is highly honored - Orange Prize Winner of 1997, so for the more literate of you, I recommend. And to be clear, I enjoyed reading the words, even if I didn't really understand the story, and I saw all the references as they floated over my head, I just didn't catch them. And yet, it was compelling and beautiful.
Here's the back cover testimonial:
Sensual, vivid, utterly spellbinding, Fugitive Pieces is a novel about loss, the process of memory, and the redemptive powers of love, which resonates long after the final page.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Loved your review and as I don't feel very literate myself thanks for reading it for me!! LOL!! I have stayed away from books that are told with a heavy use of metaphors because it all just goes right over my head!!
ReplyDeletestaci - sometimes I feel like I'm close to getting the idea in literate books, but this one I didn't get close enough.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you on this one. I loved reading the individual paragraphs, but sometimes I didn't have a clue what was going on!
ReplyDeleteThis is a book which needs to be re-read several times to fully appreiciate it (something I'm not going to do!)
I seem to remember this (or parts of it) being read on the CBC many years ago. I have a quote in my quotes folder from it:
ReplyDeleteHold a book in your hand and you're a pilgrim at the gates of a new city.
Anne Michaels,
citing a Hebrew saying in Fugitive Pieces
Don't think I'll read it - I just mentioned something on my blog about troubles with metaphors. :<)
I loved this book so much, I don't remember being confused by it though I'm struggling to remember all of the ending, and just getting fragments - doesn't a son or someone return to the scene of his childhood?
ReplyDeleteI hated this book... It just did not do anything for me! I always feel weird saying that because, well, it is considered one of the best Canadian books ever... but, it was not for me!
ReplyDeleteYikes. I hope I like this one better than you did! I got a copy on the recommendation of Simon Van Booy, when I interviewed him. He said he loves Anne Michaels' books so much that he'd give her a kidney if she needed one. And, then he paused and said, "Not that I don't value my kidneys . . . "
ReplyDeletefarmlanebooks - I'm glad you understand what I meant. I also am not planning to read it again!
ReplyDeletenan - there were many great quotes and the writing was beautiful.
katrina - I can be a little dense sometimes, and I know that many people love the book. Really loved it, and I can see why a person could. I never got in the groove of the story maybe. It ended up being an admirer of Jakob that returned to his Greece homeland.
I know I loved The Bone People and I could see how someone wouldn't like it, but it resonated with me when I read it. I'm glad you commented that you liked it so others can see that it is recommended.
kailana - yeah, it's hard to say you don't like a book that is beloved, it's like being unCanadian.
bookfool - Lots of people really liked it! Don't listen to me. And I did like the writing and it never bored me. (except some of the archeology/biology)
Great review! I liked the book too but I loved the movie. Have you seen it?
ReplyDelete